On
May 28, the Cincinnati Zoo faced a serious problem. A four-year-old child named
Isiah Gregg had fallen into the zoo’s gorilla enclosure. Harambe, a 17-year-old
silverback gorilla then grabbed the boy and dragged him around by the leg. The
boy could have easily suffered life threatening injuries. Zoo officials responded
with lethal force and killed the silverback gorilla.
The story has brought
global attention to the Cincinnati zoo. While the zoo has many supporters, they
also have just as many non-supporters. I watched the video and support the
zoo’s decision. Here is why the zoo made the best decision:
- A 450 pound silverback gorilla like Harambe could have easily killed the child without using much force.
- Had the gorilla killed the child, authorities would still have been forced to kill Harambe.
I have read many Facebook posts and articles about this
tragedy. I found many of the comments deplorable. People would have rather seen
the boy die instead of the gorilla. Really? Valuing a gorilla’s life over a
child’s life makes you a shoo-in for a Darwin Award, which goes to Homo sapiens
with an I.Q. that can fit into a bottle cap.
Click here to read the entire
article.

No comments:
Post a Comment